Thank you to Andres for this interesting letter that he gave me permission to put up as a guest post.
But first this...
For all the ins and outs of this discussion I've been most struck by the idea of 'training'. We know that in the 30s Krishnamacharya was teaching both a slower Vinyasa Krama approach to asana as well as the Ashtanga vinyasa approach that Pattabhi Jois has continued with some modification (no kumbhaka, relatively fixed sequences). It was this sense of 'training' perhaps the Krishnamacharya employed with the boys of the Mysore palace that is often most striking about modern Ashtanga.
Recently I asked a VERY long term Ashtanga practitioner and meditator about the practice, one word in particular stands out in his answer, "endurance", 'the practice is about endurance'.
OK, if it had been anyone else I might have dismissed that as a truism, of course the practice is about endurance....and stamina, it's a long sequence and just when you get a handle on it you start adding on another sequence and then another. Here in Kristina's shala there are practitioner's coming in almost two hours before me to practice all of Primary as well as 2nd series up to Pinca Mayurasana and still end up in savasana around the same time as me...and I breathe pretty slowly through my 2nd.
But this man has practiced a long time, a very long time and had many years to meditate on it, if this is the word he's come up with then it deserves some reflection.
Endurance....., I'm in Crete, Greece, no surprise then that the Stoics come to mind. The stoics were all about endurance, inspired partly by Socrates perhaps and his refusal to flee Athens and endure his own trial the Stoics accepted fate and all it threw at them, in fact they not only accepted fate, they were devoted to it. Stoic practice was a devotional practice, it was a discipline.
And aren't we stoical in our approach to our practice, Krishna's children act(ing) through our practice without attachment, how is Marchiyasana D today, how, Kapo, how Karanda. Tomorrow a friend and Ashtanga practitioner will be coming to the studio, he's broken his ankle, wearing a cast but will still practice with modifications, what else is that but stoic. Often it appears that it's the practice that we are devoted to, it may even seem that way to ourselves but perhaps it's rather that the devotion is in the practicing of the practice the act of prayer rather than the prayer itself.
So endurance leads us to the Stoics which leads us to devotion and perhaps to Ishvarapranidhana
Our friend Wikipedia and its etymology section is perhaps useful here
Īśvara-Praṇidhāna (ईश्वर-प्रणिधान) represents surrender to, and love for, the divinity within the individual in Hinduism and Yoga.
Etymology and meaning
In its simplest form, the word is a combination of the words (sometimes hyphenated), Īśvara, meaning Lord, Controller, God, Supreme Being or Life Force, and pra-ṇi-dhā-na, meaning "attention to, love for, surrender to, faith in," or "reunion with.""Attentiveness" and "Surrender" are both close English approximations.[1] A close literal English translation of "Īśvara-praṇidhāna" would give "Attentiveness to God" or "Surrender to God." As one of the final or "supreme" stages of many forms of Yoga, the "surrender" aspect of Ishvara-Pranidhana is often used to describe the step, whereas "attentiveness" describes the practice. Both are used interchangeably. Note the similarity to the literal meaning of Islam—submission or surrender to God. A close Christian term would be the Love of God.
There's that word surrender that I'm always so uncomfortable with, surrender in the stoic sense though I find less problematic, in this sense there is a radical acceptance not to god necessarily but to the workings of god, the myriad causes resulting from the first cause ( Some interesting comparisons between the stoic employment of Zeus here with Ishvara).
So in our practice we are perhaps practising endurance, training, preparing, ourselves to endure (not even going to touch on the interesting New Testament Greet idea of endurance as patience, surely another aspect of our practice - or perhaps should be) and we do this through keeping the practice challenging and by accepting our practice as it is that day, that moment, offering ourselves up to to the practice, surrendering ourselves to it and doing so with devotion.
Now about those Epicureans......
UPDATE: just remembered my old friend and fellow blogger Noble wrote a post on Ashtanga and the Stoics, just found it http://yogadragonden.blogspot.gr/2013/07/stoic-philosophy-yoga-and-how-not-to.html
You can probably tell that I'm just playing with the ideas above chewing on the cud of endurance, more to come perhaps until then, here's Andre's letter and links
Hi Anthony,
But first this...
For all the ins and outs of this discussion I've been most struck by the idea of 'training'. We know that in the 30s Krishnamacharya was teaching both a slower Vinyasa Krama approach to asana as well as the Ashtanga vinyasa approach that Pattabhi Jois has continued with some modification (no kumbhaka, relatively fixed sequences). It was this sense of 'training' perhaps the Krishnamacharya employed with the boys of the Mysore palace that is often most striking about modern Ashtanga.
Recently I asked a VERY long term Ashtanga practitioner and meditator about the practice, one word in particular stands out in his answer, "endurance", 'the practice is about endurance'.
OK, if it had been anyone else I might have dismissed that as a truism, of course the practice is about endurance....and stamina, it's a long sequence and just when you get a handle on it you start adding on another sequence and then another. Here in Kristina's shala there are practitioner's coming in almost two hours before me to practice all of Primary as well as 2nd series up to Pinca Mayurasana and still end up in savasana around the same time as me...and I breathe pretty slowly through my 2nd.
But this man has practiced a long time, a very long time and had many years to meditate on it, if this is the word he's come up with then it deserves some reflection.
Endurance....., I'm in Crete, Greece, no surprise then that the Stoics come to mind. The stoics were all about endurance, inspired partly by Socrates perhaps and his refusal to flee Athens and endure his own trial the Stoics accepted fate and all it threw at them, in fact they not only accepted fate, they were devoted to it. Stoic practice was a devotional practice, it was a discipline.
And aren't we stoical in our approach to our practice, Krishna's children act(ing) through our practice without attachment, how is Marchiyasana D today, how, Kapo, how Karanda. Tomorrow a friend and Ashtanga practitioner will be coming to the studio, he's broken his ankle, wearing a cast but will still practice with modifications, what else is that but stoic. Often it appears that it's the practice that we are devoted to, it may even seem that way to ourselves but perhaps it's rather that the devotion is in the practicing of the practice the act of prayer rather than the prayer itself.
So endurance leads us to the Stoics which leads us to devotion and perhaps to Ishvarapranidhana
Our friend Wikipedia and its etymology section is perhaps useful here
Īśvara-Praṇidhāna (ईश्वर-प्रणिधान) represents surrender to, and love for, the divinity within the individual in Hinduism and Yoga.
Etymology and meaning
In its simplest form, the word is a combination of the words (sometimes hyphenated), Īśvara, meaning Lord, Controller, God, Supreme Being or Life Force, and pra-ṇi-dhā-na, meaning "attention to, love for, surrender to, faith in," or "reunion with.""Attentiveness" and "Surrender" are both close English approximations.[1] A close literal English translation of "Īśvara-praṇidhāna" would give "Attentiveness to God" or "Surrender to God." As one of the final or "supreme" stages of many forms of Yoga, the "surrender" aspect of Ishvara-Pranidhana is often used to describe the step, whereas "attentiveness" describes the practice. Both are used interchangeably. Note the similarity to the literal meaning of Islam—submission or surrender to God. A close Christian term would be the Love of God.
There's that word surrender that I'm always so uncomfortable with, surrender in the stoic sense though I find less problematic, in this sense there is a radical acceptance not to god necessarily but to the workings of god, the myriad causes resulting from the first cause ( Some interesting comparisons between the stoic employment of Zeus here with Ishvara).
So in our practice we are perhaps practising endurance, training, preparing, ourselves to endure (not even going to touch on the interesting New Testament Greet idea of endurance as patience, surely another aspect of our practice - or perhaps should be) and we do this through keeping the practice challenging and by accepting our practice as it is that day, that moment, offering ourselves up to to the practice, surrendering ourselves to it and doing so with devotion.
Now about those Epicureans......
UPDATE: just remembered my old friend and fellow blogger Noble wrote a post on Ashtanga and the Stoics, just found it http://yogadragonden.blogspot.gr/2013/07/stoic-philosophy-yoga-and-how-not-to.html
You can probably tell that I'm just playing with the ideas above chewing on the cud of endurance, more to come perhaps until then, here's Andre's letter and links
Hi Anthony,
I tried to comment on the post of swami Bua but was not allowed. This is a very dear topic to me since I am trained in both yoga and the akhara tradition of kushti (indian wrestling). I am familiar with the works of Sjoman and Singleton regarding this topic. I tend to agree with them on some issues while at the same time it is obvious to me the scholastic approach is different than the practical one. I send you here my thoughts about it.
After 17 years of travelling and researching in India different forms of physical related disciplines, I am pretty confident to say that different forms of Indian gymnastics are related to Ashtanga Vinyasa due to their shared history. I include here physical Yoga, wrestling´s strength &conditioning (Vyayam) and indian pole gymnastics (Mallakhamb).
As you know, Mysore have been a well known place in south India for yoga and wrestling traditions. So is Varanasi, where Krishnamacharya studied for so many years where still today you can see both yoga and wrestling being practiced widely in schools and and around teh ghats. The Mysore Palace hosted these disciplines, having a separate room for gymnastics with various indigenous and western apparatus where Krishnamacharya used to teach. It is also quite evident from the old photos of his students performing human pyramids that he knew indian gymnastics too. Many Indian masters knew more than one discipline, as Krishnamacharya did, as swami Bua did. Even today teachers like swami Ramdev incorporate gymnastic and wrestling drills in his huge yoga camps in India.
Vyayam* is the wrestling tradition´s strength and conditioning. Besides pure wrestling techniques, indian wrestlers spend a lot of time doing different forms of drills and excercises. The wrestlers most basic conditioning excercises are the Bhaitak (squat), the Dand (urdhva-ado mukha svanasana cycle) and the Bridge (urdhva dhanurasana). There is also a combination of Bhaitak with jumb back perform a Dand and jump back which looks like a rapid form of surya namaskara. Besides this, there are many similar excercises common to Ashtanga Vinyasa like as handstands, circular leg movements such as Ardha Chandrasana (Old advanced series), neck strengthening like setu bandhasana, animal crawls like Nakrasana and many others. Many times I see the differences between the excercises of wrestling and yoga is not in form but in execution. I have visited many Akharas or wrestling schools and often they have besides the wrestling pit a Yoga room and gymnastic equipment. Of course wrestlers hold that Yoga was influenced by wrestling just as yoga adepts say it is the other way around. I think it is a meaningless question since both are very old and integral parts of the big Indian movement of pshysical culture developed during the time of indian pre-independence, which include several other disciplines too. Krishnamcharya was of course a very important figure of this movement.
Mallakhamb is the traditional indian pole gymnastics and a cross between yoga and wrestling. It was originally devised as a tool for wrestlers to train the body. It is a combination of wrestlings moves with yogasanas and acrobatics. It is also practiced in groups as you can see in the old photos of Krishnamacharya´s Yogashala in Mysore. Today the sport is growing and added the Rope Mallakhamb as a discipline for women. Most Akharas I have visited have a pole for Mallakhamb too.
Worth mentioning is also the similarity of western gymnastic drills and static holds to some vinyasas and asanas used in the ashtanga vinyasa system. To lift up from floor on the hands, to jump straight legs between arms, the various handstands (like those in old advanced series) are all common in ashtanga and gymnastics, and so is the pike (pashimottanasana), the pancake (upavistha konasana), the tuck planche (lolasana), bridge (urdhva dhanurasana), candlestick (niralamba sarvangasana), arch (shalabhasana), and many more. Did the british took their gymnastics to India? Yes they did. Where did western gymnastics come from? Well, from the Greeks and Romans whose oldest sport was wrestling. Greek-Roman Wrestling is the oldest olympic sport. Wrestling spred from India to Persia, Greece and finally Europe.
Perhaps Yoga influenced wrestling in ancient India as Krishnamacharya pointed, and from there to western arts and gymnastics. Or perhaps Ashtanga Vinyasa is a crossover between indigenous indian arts and british gymnastics. I really don´t know. But I don´t care either. I know is an awesome system and that Krishnamacharya and P. Jois were very creative masters and researchers. It is a system (in its free form a la Manju) capable of developing optimum control of body, breath and mind and thus, in my opinion, draws the best of elements of these disciplines. It does not matter if some of the techniques are new, the fundamental framework is still very old and traditional. Yoga is essentially a human technology and as with any human science, it is an on-going development and refinement of its techniques and knowledge.
Some links
Kushti Vyayam squat-thrust
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e36oDOO_hPs
Great online book about Indian Wrestling. Specially important for our topic is chapter 5
http://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft6n39p104&brand=ucpress
Very famous and funny swami Ramdev conducts popular yoga and vyayam camps
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxeopJvhJvg
Very good four part documentary about Mallakhamb
From my Google Drive a nice old book on Physical Culture and muscle control by Yogananda`s brother and teacher of Bikram himself
Friendly regards,
Andrés.